Re: [PATCH] 8021q memory leak

• Next message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: 2.5.59 __find_symbol oops"
• Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [CHECKER] 87 potential array bounds error/buffer overruns in 2.5.53"
• In reply to: Michael Rozhavsky: "[PATCH] 8021q memory leak"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] 8021q memory leak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Rozhavsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a memory leak in vlan module of 2.4.20
>
> When last vlan of the group is removed the group is unhashed but not
> deleted.
>
> Attached patch fixes this memory leak and completes implementation of
> memory debug output.

I believe some of the memory leaks were fixed in the -pre3 patch.
I'll wander through the code to make sure that the ones you found
were addressed.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: 2.5.59 __find_symbol oops"
• Previous message: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: [CHECKER] 87 potential array bounds error/buffer overruns in 2.5.53"
• In reply to: Michael Rozhavsky: "[PATCH] 8021q memory leak"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] 8021q memory leak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:24 EST