Re: frlock and barrier discussion

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 17:32:45 EST


On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 18:20, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> If I understand the Intel documentation correctly, then i386 doesn't need them:
> "Writes by a single processor are observed in the same order by all processors"

See the PPro errata. There are some constraints on this in the real
world. You may need locked ops on the ppro and earlier cpus while
being able to do it the fast way on PII and higher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:24 EST