Re: [PCMCIA] [IDE] [2.5.59-mm7] Badness in kobject_register call trace

• Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
• Previous message: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: futimes()?"
• In reply to: Charles Baylis: "[PCMCIA] [IDE] [2.5.59-mm7] Badness in kobject_register call trace"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 23:25, Charles Baylis wrote:
> On inserting a PCMCIA compact flash adapter, I get this backtrace. I presume
> this fits in the "yes, 2.5 IDE isn't finished yet" category. Other
> information available on request.

Badness in kobject_register is something that whoever did kobject stuff for
IDE broke. Its not a change done by the IDE people. Hopefully whoever did
the kobject stuff will fix it

As to the IDE side, idecs is a bit iffy in 2.5.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
• Previous message: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: futimes()?"
• In reply to: Charles Baylis: "[PCMCIA] [IDE] [2.5.59-mm7] Badness in kobject_register call trace"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:08 EST