Re: PnP model

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 03 2003 - 10:45:09 EST


On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:55, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> I strongly vote to follow the same behaviour as PCI code does:
> It means call the activation / enabling / setting functions from the
> probe() callbacks. Only the driver knows what's the best. Including
> the manual assignment of resources.

I agree. A lot of drivers should be able to use one model for everything
including "enable_device" stuff. Right now its all a bit too detailed.

Also the locking model seems very unclear and there are hot swappable ISA
bays

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:11 EST