On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:32 am, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> A small patch to discuss, it's about killing an process in an out-of-memory
> condition. First from the code I don't see any prohibition that it kills
> init, if reaches maximum badness points, don't think thats something
> anybody anytime wants. Sure for desktop systems this very unlikely to ever
> occur, but for small embedded systems that could happen.
ok.
> Second proposal is to give processes that are direct childs from init a
> special bonus, normally that are those we don't want to get killed. They
> are either important or get respawned eitherway creating an endless oom
> condition loop when killing them.
And what about processes that get reparented to init? These could be causing
the OOM. I didn't think that the p_ptr was null when reparenting happens.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.milAny opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:14 EST