Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 07:20:51 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21-pre4: PDC ide driver problems with shared interrupts"
Previous message: Mahesh.Pujara@lntinfotech.com: "Linux kernel routing tables"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:41:34PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:

> > So why don't you try it out? GCC offers everything you need for this
> > experiment.
>
> I did. Others did it too on occasion.

You seem to have forgotten to attach the numbers to your mail.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.21-pre4: PDC ide driver problems with shared interrupts"
Previous message: Mahesh.Pujara@lntinfotech.com: "Linux kernel routing tables"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Next in thread: Dipankar Sarma: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:17 EST