Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:12:03PM -0800, Samuel Flory wrote:
>
>
>>Is the dac960 compile still broken? Or did it break again?
>>
>>make[3]: Entering directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/include -Wall
>>-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
>>-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
>>-nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=DAC960 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB
>>-c DAC960.c
>>DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_ProcessCompletedBuffer':
>>DAC960.c:3029: warning: passing arg 1 of `blk_finished_io' makes pointer
>>from integer without a cast
>>DAC960.c:3029: too few arguments to function `blk_finished_io'
>>make[3]: *** [DAC960.o] Error 1
>>make[3]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
>>make[2]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>make[1]: *** [_subdir_block] Error 2
>>make[1]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers'
>>make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2
>>
>>
>
>It was supposed to be fixed I need to re-check.. (I usually don't
>compile it so I didn't notice sorry)
>
>
Just wondering it looked familar. I think I've got the patch someone
posted a while back.
-- There is no such thing as obsolete hardware. Merely hardware that other people don't want. (The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition) Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST