Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59

From: David Wagner (daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 12:16:39 EST


Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional
>patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks
>for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what
>I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM.

You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know.
In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended
to support a broad range of security modules and security policies.
LSM is bigger than just SELinux.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST