On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:30:50 -0800
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> What I'd really like to know is if we really need a glibc2.3 image.
> Would the guy who had the segfaults step foward and confirm/deny the
> use of the static image? We haven't had any other problem reports
> related to glibc2.3 so it may be there is no need to do anything but
> kill the static version.
Indeed; I've had time to try the glibc2.2 version, and this seems to
work fine running a quick bk changes. The static version is what was
segfaulting. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:21 EST