[PATCH][TRIVIAL] ACPI_PROCESSOR depends on CPU_FREQ

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: possible partition corruption"
• Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance"
• Next in thread: Rusty Lynch: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] ACPI_PROCESSOR depends on CPU_FREQ"
• Maybe reply: Rusty Lynch: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] ACPI_PROCESSOR depends on CPU_FREQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

After pulling from Linus's tree my build broke while attempting to
compile drivers/acpi/processor.c because cpufreq_get_policy() and
cpufreq_set_policy() were not defined.

Here is a quick Kconfig fix.

    --rustyl

--- drivers/acpi/Kconfig.orig 2003-02-06 13:29:24.000000000 -0800
+++ drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2003-02-06 13:31:01.000000000 -0800
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
 
 config ACPI_PROCESSOR
         tristate "Processor"
+ depends on CPU_FREQ
         depends on IA64 && !IA64_HP_SIM || X86 && ACPI && !ACPI_HT_ONLY
         help
           This driver installs ACPI as the idle handler for Linux, and uses

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: possible partition corruption"
• Previous message: John Bradford: "Re: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance"
• Next in thread: Rusty Lynch: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] ACPI_PROCESSOR depends on CPU_FREQ"
• Maybe reply: Rusty Lynch: "Re: [PATCH][TRIVIAL] ACPI_PROCESSOR depends on CPU_FREQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST