Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 11:47:32 EST


Hi!

> The design I proposed is to have multiple I/O queues, where to apply the
> elevator, and to choose the queue in function of the task->pid that is
> sumbitting the bh/bio. You'll have to apply an hash to the pid and you
> probably want a perturbation timer that will change the hash function
> every 30 sec or so. Plus I want a special queue for everything
> asynchronoys. So that the asynchronoys queue will be elevated and

What about adding speicial queue (queues?) for niced things? That way
nice -20 job would not interfere with normal processes, not even for
I/O.
                                                                Pavel

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST