Re: compiling kernel with debug and optimization

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 14:23:24 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Switch APIC (+nmi, +oprofile) to driver model"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]"
In reply to: devnetfs: "compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Next in thread: devnetfs: "Re: compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Reply: devnetfs: "Re: compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> Does compiling with -g option degrade performance? IMO it should NOT.
>
> If that's true, then why dont we compile kernels with both -g and -O2
> always?

Build with -g takes *a lot* of diskspace, like 1Gig.
Pavel

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: Switch APIC (+nmi, +oprofile) to driver model"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]"
In reply to: devnetfs: "compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Next in thread: devnetfs: "Re: compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Reply: devnetfs: "Re: compiling kernel with debug and optimization"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:33 EST