Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:08, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>>I've been doing some testing with RH 8.0 on an Ezra 800Mhz
>>machine.
>>
>>Even when lightly loaded select() often returns 3-9 miliseconds slower
>>than the timeout would suggest. I know select is not guaranteed to
>>return with < 10ms accuracy, but with almost no load, shouldn't it
>>at least return with 1ms accuracy on average?
>
> no
> the kernel.org kernels will return in multiple-of-10ms quantities due to
> HZ having the value of 100.
> 2.4.18-14 (which is btw obsoleted by several security errata) has a HZ
> value of 512 so will return in shorter quantities, EXCEPT when you
> always try to wait exactly 10ms of course....
For posterity's sake...I think I found a somewhat suitable work around.
I set up the real-time-clock at 1024hz, open /dev/rtc, and then add it's
file descriptor to my select input set when (0 < timeout < 10).
This causes a near busy-spin on slower cpus...but for me at least that
is the lesser of two evils...
If anyone has any cleaner/better/faster/ hacks they feel like sharing,
do let me know!
PS. Don't use SCHED_RR with this hack..or you can live-lock your system
if it's like mine :)
Thanks,
Ben
-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:49 EST