Re: PATCH: header update for arcnet updates (again to match 2.4)

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 05:18:31 EST


On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 19:31, Alan Cox wrote:
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux-2.5.61/include/linux/com20020.h linux-2.5.61-ac1/include/linux/com20020.h
> --- linux-2.5.61/include/linux/com20020.h 2003-02-10 18:37:58.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.5.61-ac1/include/linux/com20020.h 2003-02-14 23:32:27.000000000 +0000
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> void com20020_remove(struct net_device *dev);
>
> /* The number of low I/O ports used by the card. */
> -#define ARCNET_TOTAL_SIZE 9
> +#define ARCNET_TOTAL_SIZE 8

Er, is this definitely right?

Don't we often have the hardware address in a set of DIP switches at
ioaddr+8?

-- 
dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:14 EST