Hi!
> > Well, and does slow-low-power mean 300MHz, 1.4V as bios said, or
> > 300MHz, 1.2V which is probably also safe?
>
> I have no idea... that's the point... the user almost never knows what
> *exact* magic values are required, they just want fast-on-power or
> slow-on-battery sort of thing.
Well, but system also does not know. And *I* need a way to tell my
system what the right thing is.
> > What about
> > "as-fast-as-possible-but-not-exceed-140MHz-because-batteries-are-
> > running-low-and-can-not-give-enough-current"? That's different from
> > "fast-high-power", but it is *also* different from
> > "slow-low-power". [This actually matters on beasts like
> > zaurus]. What about
> > "as-low-power-as-possible-but-make-sure-you-can-keep-display-up"?
> > [On some machines cpu must be > some HMz for display to still work].
>
> this just shows how silly these complex schemes are
>
> you pick two options, a slow and fast option; both should work
Well, but this simple user interface means pretty complicated
insides.
Pavel
-- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:23 EST