Thanks for many advices about pc980155 driver.
I'm trying to cleanup it.
>> +int pc98_bios_param(struct block_device *bdev, int *ip)
>
> This should _not_ be in sd.c but the lowlevel driver.
There is a specification for PC98 SCSI HA. So we can use this
function commonly across all HA (except for bad clones). I think,
this is better than patching many drivers by same way. Is this a
bad idea?
>> +static spinlock_t wd_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
>
> Where is this used?
I forgot to remove it.
Thanks,
Osamu Tomita
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST