Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Thu Feb 20 2003 - 10:38:22 EST


Hi,

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Adam J. Richter wrote:

> Anyhow, my point is that removing a piece of hardware
> does not require that the corresponding module be unloaded
> immediately.

That's true, but when a piece of hardware is removed, you usually also
want to get rid of some data structures, but if the relevant functions are
not prepared to be called outside of module_exit, you have a huge problem.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST