Re: Framebuffers / Matrox

From: Jurriaan (thunder7@xs4all.nl)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 00:49:00 EST

Next message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: [ATM] who 'owns' the skb created by drivers/atm?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ATM] who 'owns' the skb created by drivers/atm?"
In reply to: James Williams: "Framebuffers / Matrox"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: James Williams <fido@tcob1.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:14:34AM +0000
> Originally to: All
>
> Hello everybody.
>
> Has anyone have a patch or fix to fix the Framebuffer compile bug for the Matrox
> cards in Kernel 2.5.xx?
>
In my mailer, this was mentioned just 10 messages above this one. It
really helps to read this list :-)

ftp://platan.vc.cvut.cz/pub/linux/matrox-latest/matroxfb-2.5.59.gz

applies and works with 2.5.62 even.

Kind regards,
Jurriaan

-- 
And the gosts of hope walk silent halls
At the death of the promised land
All is gone, all is gone
But these changing winds can turn cold and hostile
	New Model Army
GNU/Linux 2.5.62 SMP/ReiserFS 2x2793 bogomips load av: 0.03 0.06 0.08
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: [ATM] who 'owns' the skb created by drivers/atm?"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [ATM] who 'owns' the skb created by drivers/atm?"
In reply to: James Williams: "Framebuffers / Matrox"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST