On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 05:40:19AM +0100, Toplica Tanaskovi?? wrote:
<hopefully you'll see this on Linux-kernel, as eunet.yu is unresolvable
here, and I'm getting bounces>
> I am probably wrong, but I think that via-kt400.c in 2.5 is unnecessary, so
> I've excluded it from this backport, with some changes in via-agp.c. I did
> some tests, but most things are untested due to lack of hardware.
Yes. via-kt400.c was unnecessary (well, it was useful as a standalone
whilst I was developing it) , which was why it was later merged into
via-agp.c in 2.5.60. There were also a bunch of other fixes merged
there, so if you based your backport on an earlier version, I suggest
you grab those changes.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:33 EST