Re: hard lockup on 2.4.20 w/ nfs over frees/wan

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 10:17:52 EST

Next message: Stelian Pop: "call_usermodehelper signals bug ?"
Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: uptime reset on 2.4.11/12 (and maybe newer versions?) at +/- 500 days ?"
In reply to: Shaya Potter: "Re: hard lockup on 2.4.20 w/ nfs over frees/wan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 20 Feb 2003, Shaya Potter wrote:

> moved from the netfinity's onboard pcnet32 adapter to an IBM branded
> Intel epro/100 w/ the intel driver in 2.4.20 and it appears very
> stable. Is it possible the pcnet/32 adapter is broken or the driver is
> buggy?

I've seen other reports of evil in that driver, I have the same Netfinity
hardware (5000's and 5100's) and I'm not even tempted to try a 2.5 kernel
on it as yet. I do have 2.5.59 and 2.5.61-ac1 kernels running in
non-critical systems, however.

-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stelian Pop: "call_usermodehelper signals bug ?"
Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: uptime reset on 2.4.11/12 (and maybe newer versions?) at +/- 500 days ?"
In reply to: Shaya Potter: "Re: hard lockup on 2.4.20 w/ nfs over frees/wan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:33 EST