Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function()

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 08:39:32 EST


On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 10:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > btw, (unrelated) shouldn't smp_call_function be doing magick checks
> > with cpu_online() ?
>
> Looks OK? It sprays the IPI out to all the other CPUs in cpu_online_map,
> and waits for num_online_cpus()-1 CPUs to answer.

You cannot do that by counting without a lot of care. IPI messages do not have
guaranteed "once only" semantics. On an error a resend can and has been observed
to cause a reissue of an IPI on PII/PIII setups

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:35 EST