Hi,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Anyway, this alone would be not reason enough to change the module
> > interface, but another module interface would give us more flexibility and
> > reduce the locking complexity.
>
> Wait, wait ! :-) There's one step you've left out: what we actually
> expect the module interface to do. We have:
There are several module interfaces:
- module user interface
- module load interface
- module driver interface
These are quite independent and so far we were talking about the last one,
so I'm a bit confused about your request to talk about the first.
<rant>
BTW Why Rusty had to completely break the first two interfaces to
"improve" the last one, is probably another mystery, I'll never
understand.
</rant>
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:43 EST