In article <20030226172213.O3910@devserv.devel.redhat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>To fix that, __constant_memcpy would have to access the data through
>union,
Which is impossible, since memcpy _fundamentally_ cannot know what the
different types are..
> or you could as well forget about __constant_memcpy and use
>__builtin_memcpy where gcc will take care about the constant copying.
Which is impossible because (a) historically __builtin_memcpy does a bad
job and (b) it doesn't solve the generic case anyway, ie for other
non-memcpy things.
The fact is, for type-based alias analysis gcc needs a way to tell it
"this can alias", which it doesn't have. Unions are _not_ useful,
_regardless_ of what silly language lawyers say, since they are not a
generic method. Unions only work for trivial and largely uninteresting
cases, and it doesn't _matter_ what C99 says about the issue, since that
nasty thing called "real life" interferes.
Until we get some non-union way to say "this can alias", that
-fno-strict-alias has to stay because gcc is too broken to allow us
doing interesting stuff in-line without it.
My personal opinion is (and was several years ago when this started
coming up) that a cast (any cast) should do it. But I don't are _what_
it is, as long as it is syntactically sane and isn't limited to special
cases like unions.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:44 EST