Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 15:13:02 EST

Next message: Andrey Nekrasov: "Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout"
Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Next in thread: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Reply: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
   Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:27:39 -0500

   Here it is. Sparc64's macros for ioctl32's assumed that cmd was u_int
   instead of u_long. This look ok to you, Dave?

We would love to see that patch :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrey Nekrasov: "Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout"
Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Next in thread: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Reply: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:44 EST