Re: Protecting processes from the OOM killer

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 10:37:56 EST


On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 14:19, Ville Herva wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:40:19PM +0000, you [Alan Cox] wrote:
> >
> > How about by not allowing your system to excessively overcommit.
> > Everything else is armwaving "works half the time" stuff.
>
> Which invites the question: the strict overcommit stuff from -ac (the 'echo
> {2,3} > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory' stuff) hasn't found it's way to
> mainline yet, has it? I wonder if it would be compatible with up-to-date
> -aa vm...

Marcelo didn't want it for base. Its in 2.5 and in -ac. There is no
longer any rmap requirement on the code so it should "just work" with
the -aa changes too

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:48 EST