Re: Proposal: Eliminate GFP_DMA

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 10:31:27 EST


On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:56, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:55:37PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 14:34, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > umm. are you volunteering to convert drivers/net/macmace.c to the pci_*
> > > API then? also, GFP_DMA is used on, eg, s390 to get memory below 2GB and
> > > on ia64 to get memory below 4GB.
> >
> > The ia64 is a fine example of how broken it is. People have to hack around
> > with GFP_DMA meaning different things on ia64 to everything else. It needs
> > to die.
>
> At least on x86-64 it is still needed when you need have some hardware
> with address limits < 4GB (e.g. an 24bit soundcard)
>
> pci_* on K8 only allows address mask 0xffffffff or unlimited.

for 2.7 the underlying low level budy allocator could (should?) just
take a DMA bitmask



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:48 EST