Re: [PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:56:43 EST

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH] allow CONFIG_SWAP=n for i386"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Use C99 initializers in net/ipv6"
In reply to: John Levon: "[PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Next in thread: John Levon: "Re: [PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Reply: John Levon: "Re: [PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 05:42:35AM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> #define pnpbios_is_static(x) ((x)->flags & 0x0100) == 0x0000
> -#define pnpbios_is_dynamic(x) (x)->flags & 0x0080
> +#define pnpbios_is_dynamic(x) ((x)->flags & 0x0080)

pnpbios_is_static() could probably use the same treatment.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH] allow CONFIG_SWAP=n for i386"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Use C99 initializers in net/ipv6"
In reply to: John Levon: "[PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Next in thread: John Levon: "Re: [PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Reply: John Levon: "Re: [PATCH] Another bitop on boolean in pnpbios"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST