Re: percpu-2.5.63-bk5-1 (properly generated)

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 17:51:15 EST


On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:40:01AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> OK, that seems to get rid of the SDET degradation, but I rigged up the
> same test you were doing (make -j) and see only marginal improvement
> from the full patch (pernode2) ... not the 6s you were seeing.
> -pernode2 was your full patch with the fix you sent, -pernode3 was the
> smaller patch you sent last. Can you try to reproduce the improvment
> were seeing, and grab a before and after profile? I don't seem to be
> able to replicate it.

Then there must have been something important in the new per_cpu users.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST