Re: WARN_ON noise in 2.5.63's kernel/sched.c:context_switch

From: Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2003 - 02:13:48 EST


William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:35:22PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > I'm getting a bunch of stack dumps from the WARN_ON newly added to
> > kernel/sched.c:context_switch:
> > if (unlikely(!prev->mm)) {
> > prev->active_mm = NULL;
> > WARN_ON(rq->prev_mm);
> > rq->prev_mm = oldmm;
> > }
>
> This means there's some kind of trouble happening, i.e. the rq->prev_mm
> pointer is not NULL when it should be.
>
> Tracking down the root cause would better serve you.

Ok, I think I found the reason; sched.c cleans up some stuff in
schedule_tail, and in this code (arch/v850/kernel/entry.S):

C_ENTRY(ret_from_fork):
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
        mov r10, r6 // switch_thread returns the prev task.
        jarl CSYM(schedule_tail), lp // ...which is schedule_tail's arg
#endif
        mov r0, r10 // Child's fork call should return 0.
        br ret_from_trap // Do normal trap return.

... it only calls that if CONFIG_PREEMPT is turned on. If I remove the
#ifdef, then I get no warnings.

I take it that the call to schedule_tail should now be unconditional?
[some other archs have the same #ifdef]

Thanks,

-Miles

-- 
97% of everything is grunge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST