Re: [PATCH] Making it easy to add system calls

From: george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 02:11:54 EST


Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Your patch makes it impossible to tell at an easy glance which syscall
> is which number. The current code makes it quite obvious which numbers
> are assigned to which syscalls, and which syscall numbers are available
> for use. We lose valuable information with this patch, even if it does
> wind up to be functionally equivalent.

Of course the numbers as well as comments on the inactive or unused
entries could be added, just as they are today. I had also considered
the possiblility of adding the system call proto type as a parameter
in the macro. This could lead to a rather complete one entry
description of the call.

Still, it seems to not be in favor, so I will let it drop.

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST