Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 13:26:06 EST


On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
> It would be nice if we had a "batch-job-able" simulation of this situation,
> to do more accurate testing with ... can anyone think of an easy way to
> do such a thing? "waggle a few windows around on X and see if it feels
> better to you or not" is kind of hard to do accurate testing with.
> Of course, the simulation has to be accurate too, or it gets stupid ;-)

It should be possible to use the same approach that the other latency
testers use (ie contest&co), by just generating some specific background
load (say, different mixtures of X clients and plain compute-bound things
like kernel compiles).

Ie measure directly exactly what we're interested in: the latency of some
general X request, under different loads.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST