Re: [RFC] i386-arch fixes/enhancements

From: Margit Schubert-While (margitsw@t-online.de)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 06:12:50 EST


        Nice to see somebody is pushing this. I am getting fed up wtih
        applying these to every 2.4.xx.
        Note that with GCC >= 3.x(Not sure about "x", definitely 3.2), the P4
compile option correctly
        generates add/sub instructions instead of the "P4 killer" inc/dec.
        Of course, in include/asm-i386, we still have incs/decs in
        processor.h, atomic.h, rwsem.h, semaphore.h uaccess.h, system.h,
        string.h, spinlock.h and smplock.h.
        With the patches and changing the includes, I can get a 5-10% improvement
        with a hefty DB app on a UP P4 which isn't to be sneezed at.
        And perhaps somebody should take a squint at the "copy_xxx_user".
        IMHO, this really should be inlined.
        Try running a DB app which bounces semaphores at a terrific rate and what
        do you see at the top of readprofile ? Yep, you guessed it.

        Margit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:36 EST