[PATCH] Re: NCPFS memleak/crazyness?

From: Petr Vandrovec (vandrove@vc.cvut.cz)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:43:27 EST


On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:30:48PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Looking at fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c (latest 2.4 bk tree), I seem to see a place
> where we use userspace-pointers directly (And eventually doing kfree on
> these). In NCP_IOC_SETOBJECTNAME handler, we allocated space (newname
> pointer), copy stuff from userspace to there and then assign userspace
> pointer to our internal structure, whoops! Or am I missing something?
>
> Seems that following patch is needed. (Same problem is present in 2.5
> and same patch should apply)

Definitely. Alan, Linus, Marcelo (alphabetically) please apply...
2.2.x should not be affected as it does not support this ioctl.
                                                Petr Vandrovec

    From Oleg Drokin:

    In NCP_IOC_SETOBJECTNAME handler, we allocated space (newname pointer),
    copy stuff from userspace to there and then assign userspace
    pointer to our internal structure, whoops!

===== fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c 1.3 vs edited =====
--- 1.3/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c Mon Sep 9 22:36:07 2002
+++ edited/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c Sun Mar 9 23:23:12 2003
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
                         oldprivatelen = server->priv.len;
                         server->auth.auth_type = user.auth_type;
                         server->auth.object_name_len = user.object_name_len;
- server->auth.object_name = user.object_name;
+ server->auth.object_name = newname;
                         server->priv.len = 0;
                         server->priv.data = NULL;
                         /* leave critical section */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:19 EST