On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> I just verified that the problem also occurs with NUMA +
>> HIGHMEM_64GB (i.e., it is not limited to HIGHMEM_4GB).
>>
>> By the way, HIGHMEM_64GB without NUMA gets a lot father, but
>> still experiences memory corruption, probably same bug that caused me
>> to downgrade to HIGHMEM_4G months ago (i.e., probably not related to
>> this NUMA problem).
>Yeah, we really ought to fix that. This one?
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Yes. Thank you for doing such meticulous job of entering it
into bugmse.osdl.org.
[About the original problem of CONFIG_NUMA bombing out on my
384MB machine with a HIGHMEM4G kernel:]
>Right ... I think I have some more patches from Andy somewhere, though
>he may not have tested with 64Gb on his PC ... I'll go look, and send
>them to you if I have.
Great, although it will probably be several hours before I can
test any patches that you send me.
Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
"Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:23 EST