Re: Load Balancing Performance

From: Jakob Oestergaard (jakob@unthought.net)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:02:35 EST


On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:28:14PM +0530, chandrasekhar.nagaraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
> But instead of path switching for every buffer head (on call of make
> request), if we switch after 50 buffer heads(ie. after 50 times make
> request is called) then it results in a better performance.
> Is there any way to find out the optimum value so that the performance is
> optimum.
> The performance is not good only when load balancing is ON. Hence we need
> performance improvement in the case of load balancing.
> Or is there any other solution to this problem.

Make the request site tunable via. procfs.

Then create a (user space) utility which experiments with various
request sizes and finds the optimum. Run the tuning program once every
time you set up a new system or change hardware.

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:25 EST