On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:41:07AM +0100, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> some numbers. They still look pretty good to me. I shrunk us from
> 1,048,576 buckets to 65536, and loaded 1,150,000 entries in there.
Interesting would be to find the sweet spot with the smallest hash table
size that still performs well. Not sure if find / is a good workload
for that though.
Also same for inode hash (but I don't have statistics for that right now)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:26 EST