[PATCH] (4/8) Eliminate brlock in net/bridge

From: Stephen Hemminger (shemminger@osdl.org)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:51 EST


Eliminate brlock in bridge code.

diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/br.c linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/br.c
--- linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/br.c 2003-03-11 09:08:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/br.c 2003-03-10 15:49:15.000000000 -0800
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
-#include <linux/brlock.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "br_private.h"
 
@@ -73,14 +72,15 @@
         unregister_netdevice_notifier(&br_device_notifier);
         br_call_ioctl_atomic(__br_clear_ioctl_hook);
 
- br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
         br_handle_frame_hook = NULL;
- br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ATM_LANE) || defined(CONFIG_ATM_LANE_MODULE)
         br_fdb_get_hook = NULL;
         br_fdb_put_hook = NULL;
 #endif
+
+ /* netif_receive_skb uses RCU */
+ synchronize_kernel();
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_should_route_hook);
diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/br_if.c linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/br_if.c
--- linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/br_if.c 2003-03-11 09:08:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/br_if.c 2003-03-10 15:50:54.000000000 -0800
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
 #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
 #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
-#include <linux/brlock.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "br_private.h"
 
@@ -87,12 +86,11 @@
 
 static void del_ifs(struct net_bridge *br)
 {
- br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
         write_lock(&br->lock);
         while (br->port_list != NULL)
                 __br_del_if(br, br->port_list->dev);
         write_unlock(&br->lock);
- br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+ synchronize_kernel();
 }
 
 static struct net_bridge *new_nb(char *name)
@@ -257,13 +255,12 @@
 {
         int retval;
 
- br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
         write_lock(&br->lock);
         retval = __br_del_if(br, dev);
         br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
         write_unlock(&br->lock);
- br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
 
+ synchronize_kernel();
         return retval;
 }
 
diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c
--- linux-2.5.64/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c 2003-03-11 09:08:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtable_broute.c 2003-03-11 15:04:04.000000000 -0800
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
-#include <linux/brlock.h>
 
 // EBT_ACCEPT means the frame will be bridged
 // EBT_DROP means the frame will be routed
@@ -68,18 +67,17 @@
         ret = ebt_register_table(&broute_table);
         if (ret < 0)
                 return ret;
- br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
         // see br_input.c
         br_should_route_hook = ebt_broute;
- br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+ synchronize_kernel();
+
         return ret;
 }
 
 static void __exit fini(void)
 {
- br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
         br_should_route_hook = NULL;
- br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+ synchronize_kernel();
         ebt_unregister_table(&broute_table);
 }
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST