On Fri, 14 March 2003 14:19:58 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 09:18, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > I don't like the whole idea that mem leak is tolerable.
> >
> > Can we just add a 4 byte scratch pad status to
> > struct _adpt_hba? Let it scribble there...
>
> Its 4 bytes (+ slab overhead), its far safer if this happens to say
> its gone forever. Its owned by the I2O controller now and it never
> gave it back
How about an (optional) counter then? If you can show that this case
is hit zero times during operation, noone will complain. On the other
hand, if some hardware hits this problem 1000+ times, we have a good
reason to find another solution.
I'd volunteer to create the patch, if the idea is accepted.
Jörn
-- Mundie uses a textbook tactic of manipulation: start with some reasonable talk, and lead the audience to an unreasonable conclusion. -- Bruce Perens - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:39 EST