Re: 2.5.64-mm6

From: Alex Tomas (bzzz@tmi.comex.ru)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 15:10:20 EST


>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:

 AM> jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu wrote:
>>
>> Andrew, I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that
>> the way ld accesses files causes the blocks on the disk to be
>> layed out poorly? That is the only thing I can think of that
>> would get fixed by copying.
>>

 AM> Exactly that. ld seeks all over the file when adding new blocks
 AM> to it, so with ext2 and ext3 (at least) there is poor
 AM> correspondence between file offset and block indices.

hmm. I thought delayed allocation should solve this problem. Isn't it?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:41 EST