On 2003.03.15 16:11 Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Willem Riede wrote:
>
> > It may not be elegant to schedule(1) with the lock taken, but it
> > does work.
> >
> > However, my latest patch doesn't seem to be applied, since in my
> > version I have a set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); before
> > the schedule.
>
> Yeah but what happens when a task tries to acquire ide_lock?
It gets to wait until I'm done.
Regards, Willem Riede.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:44 EST