Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Sun Mar 16 2003 - 03:50:45 EST


On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a
>> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that
>> sometime?

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:06:18PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Benching now.

Sorry, this should have hit the list earlier.

Throughput 294.388 MB/sec 128 procs
dbench 128 87.22s user 4286.79s system 2984% cpu 2:26.58 total

(the "before" picture was ca. 257MB/s)

vmstat and oprofile info vanished, not sure why. A rerun is possible.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:18 EST