On approximately Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:58:44AM -0600, Shawn wrote:
> Well, 2.5.65-mm1 trashed all my data... Just kidding.
>
> Actually, I'm sitting here with a load of over 25, and my gnome2 menus
> go like they're being chased by friggin fire ants. How many cans of
> whoop-ass does linux have to open for crying out loud???
>
> Almost like anticipatory /menus/! ;) Almost think I hear a *whoosh* as
> I'm plinking around with 20 cpp processes running simultaneously. Nice!
> Damn nice!
>
> So, I guess this is a subjective interactivity changes report. So, now,
> Performance == Holy sheet!
>
Just a me too here. I have been using 2.5-mm kernels for about the last 10 or
12 revisions and I thought it was good when I started but WOW, it is really good
now. It seems all of the AS bugs have been ironed out as I haven't had any odd
OOPS or hangs, and under even a serious load it still runs like a champ!
Thanks,
--
Josh McKinney | Webmaster: http://joshandangie.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux, the choice | Accept people for what they are --
of a GNU generation -o) | completely unacceptable.
Kernel 2.5.65-mm1 /\ |
on a Athlon-XP _\_v |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST