On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, george anzinger wrote:
> I found a problem with the last version. The attached is for
> 2.5.65-1.1171 (i.e. after the other post 2.5.65 changes). The bug is
> fixed, and the code even simpler here.
>
> The problem in the prior patch was that cascade should return:
> (index +1) &... not index &...
I haven't had time yet to look into any of the patches more closely,
but ...
> Here I changed the call to cascade() to expect "index" back so it
> checks for 0 instead of 1. Nice and simple.
... this is what I expected to come out from our simplification and what
made me suspicious against the previous version.
So I'd just guess the patch is fine now.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST