Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 20:58:05 EST

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Poor performance with pcnet32 on SMP"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: major/minor split"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Next in thread: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Reply: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
>
> Runs (antic): 1374.22 1487.19 1437.26
> Runs (deadline): 1238.58 1537.36 1513.04

The averages of these are equal. Can we safely conclude that this is fixed
up now?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Poor performance with pcnet32 on SMP"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: major/minor split"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Next in thread: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Reply: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 (now with deadline)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:33 EST