Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Fri Mar 21 2003 - 13:46:49 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: remove __NO_VERSION__ from procfs"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: add another clock tick rate variant"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 21 Mar 2003 01:51:50 -0500 Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> wrote:

| -extern asmlinkage int sys_ioctl(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
| +extern long sys_ioctl(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);

keep the asmlinkage (or why not?)

| -extern asmlinkage int sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname,
| - char *optval, int optlen);
| +extern long sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname,
| + char *optval, int optlen);

ditto

--
~Randy  [resending after error on first attempt]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: remove __NO_VERSION__ from procfs"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: add another clock tick rate variant"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] arch-independent syscalls to return long"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:38 EST