Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful

From: Anton Blanchard (anton@samba.org)
Date: Sun Mar 23 2003 - 01:25:47 EST

Next message: Osamu Tomita: "[PATCH 2.5.65-ac3] Updates for PC-9800 related (0/5) summary"
Previous message: Michael Frank: "ISAPNP BUG: 2.4.65 ne2000 driver w. isapnp not working"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful"
Next in thread: Adam J. Richter: "Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Did you end up deciding it was worthwhile putting a spinlock in the ppc64
> pageframe for that? Or hashing for it.

Heres an old email I dug up. It was running an sdet like thing.

Anton

Next message: Osamu Tomita: "[PATCH 2.5.65-ac3] Updates for PC-9800 related (0/5) summary"
Previous message: Michael Frank: "ISAPNP BUG: 2.4.65 ne2000 driver w. isapnp not working"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful"
Next in thread: Adam J. Richter: "Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:43 EST