Re: Deprecating .gz format on kernel.org

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 10:59:54 EST


On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote:

> That shouldn't matter, most of the times. If you want to build the
> code, you have to [bg]unzip anyway, so there is no extra cost.
> And I have a hard time to think of a real-world application where you
> don't want to unpack but need to verify the signature.

My real world includes downloading a bunch of files and burning a CD to
move them to a test environment which is completely private and has no
external connections of any kind. I don't do all files that way, of
course, but that is the way at least half of the 2.5 kernels I've used
were moved to a machine which was non-production.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:20 EST