Re: [PATCH] ENBD for 2.5.64

From: Lincoln Dale (ltd@cisco.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 02:31:31 EST


At 11:55 PM 25/03/2003 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Yeah, iSCSI handles all that and more. It's a behemoth of a
> > specification. (whether a particular implementation implements all that
> > stuff correctly is another matter...)
>
>Indeed, there are iSCSI implementations that do multipath and
>failover.

iSCSI is a transport.
logically, any "multipathing" and "failover" belongs in a layer above it --
typically as a block-layer function -- and not as a transport-layer function.

multipathing belongs elsewhere -- whether it be in MD, LVM, EVMS, DevMapper
-- or in a commercial implementation such as Veritas VxDMP, HDS HDLM, EMC
PowerPath, ...

>Both iSCSI and ENBD currently have issues with pending writes during
>network outages. The current I/O layer fails to report failed writes
>to fsync and friends.

these are not "iSCSI" or "ENBD" issues. these are issues with VFS.

cheers,

lincoln.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:22 EST