On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:27:29PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> One is struct dm_ioctl. Google tells me that it was
> noticed already that it defined a broken interface,
> and Kevin Corry submitted a patch against 2.5.51.
> Today this has not been applied yet.
>
> What is the status? Should I resubmit that patch?
DM already has a pathname-based interface. Just rip out the dev_t-
based one, this will also allow to simplify the kernel code by using
the pathname to fully setuped blockdevice helpers I added to block_dev.c
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:23 EST