Re: [PATCH] s390 update (3/9): listing & kerntypes.

• Next message: James Simmons: "Re: Framebuffer updates."
• Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (4/9): common i/o layer update."
• In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (3/9): listing & kerntypes."
• Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (3/9): listing & kerntypes."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:32:12PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > No. Either we add Kerntypes to the architecture-independent code (I'm
> all
> > for it!) or not at all. Cludging this into s390-specific code is a very,
> > very bad idea.
> Well, even if the Kerntypes gets added to the architecture-independent code
> we still would need some special s390 includes to get all the types we need.

The patches from the lkcd folks don't seem to need additional includes.
Please argue with them instead of trying to push such changes through the
backdoor.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: James Simmons: "Re: Framebuffer updates."
• Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (4/9): common i/o layer update."
• In reply to: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (3/9): listing & kerntypes."
• Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] s390 update (3/9): listing & kerntypes."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:25 EST